February 8, 2005
House Commerce Committee
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Representative:
We understand that
the House Energy and Commerce Committee
will soon markup H.R. 310, the so-called
Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of
2005. The purpose of this
correspondence is to advise you of our
opposition to this legislation in its
present form.
Our
organization—the Department for
Professional Employees, AFL-CIO—includes
among its affiliated organizations 10
national unions with nearly one-half
million media professionals, artists,
broadcasters, technicians, support
workers as well as professional athletes
who collectively are involved in all
phases of news, entertainment and sports
programming. In addition, the 25 unions
which comprise our alliance encompass
over 4 million union households with
nearly 10 million television viewers in
them who are consumers of broadcast
programming.
While the
legislation represents an overall threat
to constitutionally-protected freedom of
expression over the airways, what is
particularly objectionable about H. R.
310 is its targeting of individual
artists as well as on-air talent for
so-called violations of vague and
ambiguous decency standards. The
legislation proposes a near 50-fold
increase—from $11,000 to $500,000—in the
fines that could be levied against
individual announcers and performers.
In addition, the bill wipes away
existing FCC warning procedures used as
a precursor to implementing such fines.
This represents an
extraordinary departure from existing
enforcement protocols given the fact
that the FCC has not sanctioned
individual performers or announcers in
the past for such alleged
transgressions. In fact, the Commission
heretofore has well understood that, in
the final analysis, it is the licensee
and not their employees or guests that
are ultimately responsible for the
content that is or is not transmitted to
the public.
Finally it should
be noted that H.R. 310 may not just
apply to broadcast entities and media
personalities. The penalties within the
legislation could be used to hammer
individual citizens with substantial
fines because, in the heat or excitement
of the moment, they uttered an expletive
deemed inappropriate by a listener or
viewer.
In the last decade
deregulation-driven media consolidation
has undermined localism in broadcast
television and radio and in the process
served to diminish community coverage
and standards. Now Congress, through
legislation such as H.R. 310, would
reward these media monopolies by
allowing them to escape full and
complete accountability for their
programming decisions by instead
imposing huge statutory liabilities upon
their media employees. In the
environmental arena, this would be
tantamount to allowing the EPA to
sanction workers for the pollution
violations of their employers.
We urge you to
support efforts to remove from this
legislation the increased penalties for
either media workers as well as
individual citizens. Failing that, we
urge your vote against H.R. 310.
Thank you in
advance for your consideration of our
views.
Sincerely,
Paul E. Almeida
President