|
Fact Sheet 2004-1
Professional
Women: Vital Statistics
General
Statistics
<
The number of working women has
risen from 5.1 million in 1900, to 18.4 million
in 1950, to nearly 65 million in 2003. The
number of working women is projected to exceed
77 million by 2012.1
<
Women accounted for 18% of the
labor force in 1900, and 47% in 2003. In 2012,
women will account for 48% of the labor force.2
<
The number of women in the labor
force is expected to increase by more than 14%
between 2002 and 2012, while a 10% increase is
projected for men.3
<
While in 1900 only 20.4% of all
women worked, in 2003, more than 60% worked.
Sixty-two percent of women are expected to be in
the paid labor force by 2012.4
<
Almost 73% of working women had
white collar occupations in 2003, a percentage
that is expected to increase. Women employed in
professional and related occupations accounted
for 24.5% of all working women in 2003.5
<
Women are the majority of workers
in the occupational category expected to grow
most rapidly: the professional and related
occupations, which are expected to increase by
more than 23% from 2002–2012.6
<
Labor force participation has
increased most dramatically among married women.7
<
Today most mothers—even those with
the youngest children—participate in the labor
force.8
<
Half of all multiple job-holders
in 2003 were women, up from 20% in 1973.9
Women are the majority of temporary and
part-time workers.10
Occupational
Distribution
<
While women are the majority of
professional employees, their occupational
distribution remains different from men.
–
92% of registered nurses, 82% of all
elementary and middle school teachers, and 98%
of all preschool and kindergarten teachers
employed in 2003 were women, compared with less
than 9% of all civil engineers, 7% of electrical
and electronics engineers, and 3% of all
aircraft pilots and flight engineers.11
<
Still, the different distribution
of men and women among specific professional
occupations was less pronounced in 2003 than in
1985.
–
The percentage of technical writers who
were female increased from 36% to 66% between
1985 and 2003.12
–
Women pharmacists increased from 30% in
1985 to 52% in 2003.13
–
The percentage of female chemists
increased from 11% in 1985 to 36% in 2003.14
<
In 2003, women accounted for 28%
of all lawyers, 30% of all physicians and
surgeons, and 66% of all psychologists.15
The Wage Gap
Persists
<
In 2002, women earned 77% as much
as men. For women of color, the gap was wider.
African American women earned 67%, and Latina
women 55%, of men’s weekly earnings. While
Asian Pacific American women do better, they
still earn only 83.5% as much as men.16
<
The gap between the wages of men
and women is larger in the U.S. than in Germany,
Britain, France, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, and
New Zealand.17
<
America’s working families lose
$200 billion of income annually to the wage
gap—an average loss of more than $4,000 each for
a working women’s families every year because of
unequal pay.18
<
Equal pay is a problem in every
occupational category:
–
In 2003, professional and technical women
earned almost 27% less than their male
counterparts;19
–
Women in office and administrative
support occupations earned over 12% less than
those who were men;20
–
Women in sales occupations earned 38%
less than similarly employed men, while women in
service occupations earned almost 16% less than
men in these occupations.21
<
More specifically, in 2003:
–
female physicians and surgeons earned a
whopping 41% less than their male counterparts;22
–
female college and university teachers
earned 21% less than those who were male;23
–
female lawyers earned 13% less than male
lawyers;24 and
–
female computer scientists and systems
analysts earned 19% less than similarly employed
men, as did female computer programmers.25
<
The wage gap exists even in
occupations where women considerably outnumber
men. In 2003:
–
female elementary and middle school
teachers earned more than 10% less than
similarly employed men, while female secondary
school teachers earned 9% less than male;26
–
female registered nurses earned 12% less
than their male colleagues;27 and
–
female word processors and typists earned
8% less than male.28
<
For full-time workers aged 25 and
older in 2001:
–
the median income of a female high school
graduate was more than 27% less than that of her
male counterpart;29
–
the median income of a women with a
bachelor’s degree was 25% (or $13,290) less than
that of a similarly qualified man;30
–
a women with a master’s degree earned 28%
(or $18,658) less than a man with a master’s
degree;31
–
the median annual income of a women with
a professional degree was 40% (or $39,907) less
than that of her male counterpart;32
and
–
a women with a doctoral degree earned
more than 25% (or $20,652) less than a similarly
qualified man.33
<
Because women are paid less when
they work, they receive smaller pensions (and
Social Security checks) when they retire. Less
than half of all wage and salaried women in the
U.S. participate in a pension plan. Half of all
older women with income from a private pension
receive less than $5,600 a year, compared with
$10,340 for older men.34
Women’s Economic
Responsibilities
<
In 2002, 49% of women were not
married; 58% of them were in the labor force.35
<
The proportion of families in
which the husband, but not the wife, worked
outside the home declined from 66% in the 1940’s
and ’50s to only 19% in 2001.36
<
The overall labor force
participation rate of mothers with children
under 18 was 72.2% in 2002.37
<
Whereas in 1970, 12% of all
children lived in one parent families, in 2002
almost 31% lived with only one parent.
Seventy-three percent of these children lived
with their mothers.38
<
In 2002, more than 14% of all
working families were headed by a single mother.39
<
Almost 32% of families where
children under 18 lived with their mother (with
no father present) were below the poverty level
in 2002.40
<
By contrast, married couple
families had the lowest poverty rate (6%).41
More Degrees
<
Women have been earning more
bachelor’s degrees than men since 1982 and they
have been earning more master’s degrees than men
since 1981. They are expected to earn 58% of
all bachelor’s and master’s degrees conferred in
2004.42
<
Women are expected to earn more
than 46% of the first professional degrees
conferred in 2004, up from 2.6% in 1961.43
<
Women are expected to earn 44% of
all doctoral degrees in 2004, while in 1961 they
earned only 10.5% of all doctoral degrees.44
<
The proportion of women in law
school increased from 3.7% in 1963 to more than
49% in academic year 2002–03.45
<
The proportion of women in medical
school increased from 5.8% in academic year
1960–61 to 49% in academic year 2001–02.46
<
Between academic years 1959–60 and
2000–01, the percentage of degrees in dentistry
earned by women increased from 0.8% to 39%.47
Women and Unions
<
Today more than 6.7 million
working women are union members.48
<
In 2003, 44% of all union members
were women, up from 19% in 1962.49
<
Women are forming and joining
unions at a faster rate than men. Fifty-five
percent of all newly organized workers are
women.50
The Union
Advantage for Women
<
In 2003, union women earned weekly
wages that were 25% more than women who were not
union members, while union men earned 17% more
than nonunion men.51
<
The differences are even more
marked for African American and Latina women:
–
the median weekly earnings of African
American union women were more than 26% more
than their nonunion counterparts;52
–
Latina women who were union members and
median weekly earnings that were almost 34%
higher than their nonunion counterparts.53
<
Union women and men are more
likely than nonunion workers to have health and
pension benefits, and to receive paid holidays
and vacations, and life and disability
insurance.54
1–4 U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Perspectives on Working Women: A Databook,
Bulletin 2080, 1980; Employment and Earnings,
Vol. 51, No. 1; BLS News, 04–148.
5 Employment
and Earnings, op. cit.
6 Hecker,
Daniel, “Occupational Employment Projections to
2012,” U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Monthly Labor Review, Vol.
127, No. 2, February 2004.\
7&8 U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Current Population Survey, Annual Social and
Economic Supplement, March 2003.
9 U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Multiple Jobholders by Sex, November
2003.
10 Mishel,
Lawrence, J. Bernstein and H. Boushey, State
of Working America, 2002–2003.
11–15
Employment and Earnings, op. cit.
16 U.S.
Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census,
Current Population Survey, Series P–36,
2003.
17 Organization
of Economic Cooperation and Development;
International Labor Organization; Statistics
Canada; Employment and Earnings, op. cit.
18 Institute
for Women’s Policy Research, Equal Pay for
Working Families, 1999.
19–28
Employment and Earnings, op. cit.
29–33 U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Current Population Survey, 2002.
34 U.S. Social
Security Administration, Office of Research,
Evaluation and Statistics, Income of the
Population Aged 55 or Older, 2002.
35–37
Current Population Survey, op. cit.
38–41 U.S.
Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census,
Children’s Living Arrangements and
Characteristics: 2002, June 2003.
42–44 U.S.
Department of Education, National Center for
Education Statistics, Digest of Education
Statistics: 2002.
45 American Bar
Association, Legal Education Division.
46 American
Association of Medical Colleges, Databook,
2003 Edition.
47 American
Dental Association, 2000–01 Survey of
Pre-Doctoral Dental Education, 2003.
48–49 BLS
News, op. cit.
50
Bronfenbrenner, K. “Organizing Women Workers in
the Global Economy: Findings from NLRB
Certification Elections — 1998–1999,” 2001.
51–53 BLS
News, op. cit.
54 U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
BLS News, USDL:03-489.
For more information
about professional women, see “Salaried and
Professional Women: Relevant Statistics”
on our Website:
www.dpeaflcio.org

Source: DPE Research
Department
03/29/04
815 16th Street, NW, N.W. – 7th Floor Washington, DC 20006
Contact: Pamela Wilson,
(202) 638-6684;
pwilson@dpeaflcio.org |