| Home > Programs & Publications > Issue Fact Sheets > Fact Sheet 2005: Nurses: Vital Signs | |
|
Fact Sheet 2005
More Nurses Are Needed · Registered nursing was among the fastest growing occupations in the 1990s. By 2004, the number of employed RNs was 2,464,000 ¾ an increase of 55% since 1990.1 · For the first time, the U.S. Department of Labor identified “Registered Nurse” as the occupation expected to experience the largest job growth in the next 10 years. The need for RNs is predicted to continue to grow rapidly, rising by 27.3% between 2002 and 2012, compared to 14.8% during the same period for all occupations. More than 1.1 million openings for RNs are projected by 2012 due to growth and replacements.2
·
Despite the projected 20.2%
employment increase for licensed practical and
vocational nurses for 2002-2012,
their employment numbers have in fact been
decreasing for the past two years. In 2004,
there were 517,000 LPN/LVNs, down 2.6% from the
year before.3,4 The Nurse Work Force Is Aging and Changing · The vast majority of nurses are women, although the percentage of men in the field increased slightly in the last decade: the percentage of male RNs rose from 6.2% in 1994 to 7.8% in 2004, and the percentage of male LPN/LVNs increased slightly from 4.9%–5.7%.5 · Most nurses are white, although the percentage of minorities among nurses is increasing. From 1994–2004: – The Black or African American share of RN positions increased from 9.3% to 10.1%. The proportion of black LPN/LVNs also increased from 18.7% to 20.8%. African Americans made up 10.7% of the total labor force in 2004.6 – The percentage of Hispanic or Latino RNs increased from 2.9% to 4.4% from 1994–2004. Latinos’ share of LPN/LVN positions increased from 4.3% to 5.6%, while they made up 12.9% of the labor force in 2004.7
·
The nurse population is aging, since fewer people are entering the
profession. The average age of RNs increased
from 36 in 1980 to 45 in 2000. Over two-thirds
of RNs are 40 or older. In 1992, 24% of RNs
were between the ages of 25 and 34; by 2000,
less than 16% of RNs were in that age group.8 A Severe Shortage of Nurses Causes a Crisis · The U.S. is experiencing a severe nursing crisis that will intensify as baby boomers age and the need for health care grows. The Health Resources and Services Administration estimated nurse shortages in 30 states in 2000 and projects the problem to expand to 44 states and the District of Columbia by 2020.9 Another study predicts a shortfall of 400,000 RNs by 2020.10 Factors involved in the shortage include insufficient new nursing school graduates, partly due to a serious shortage of nursing school faculty; an aging nurse population, and widespread burnout among nurses because of understaffing. · Nursing School Enrollment: Enrollments in entry-level RN baccalaureate programs began declining in 1995 and continued until 2001. While the number of students entering 4-year programs jumped nearly 9% in 2002, it was still 9% lower than in 1995. Enrollment of RNs with associate’s degrees or nursing diplomas in baccalaureate programs continued to decline for the fourth consecutive year.11 However, admissions to associate degree nursing programs increased by 16% from 2001–2002, according to the American Association of Community Colleges. · Shortage of Faculty for Nursing Schools: The shortage of faculty makes it impossible to train sufficient nurses. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing has reported a national vacancy rate of 7.4%. In 2003, 11,304 qualified applicants to baccalaureate, master’s and doctoral programs were not accepted. The shortage of faculty was cited as the reason why more students were not admitted.12 · Understaffing: There are not enough nurses to do what needs to be done on any given shift and the nurses who are on duty are exhausted and stressed. A 2003 study by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) found the environment in which nurses work a breeding ground for medical errors which will continue to threaten patient safety until substantially reformed. The IOM points to numerous studies showing that increased infections, bleeding and cardiac and respiratory failure are associated with inadequate numbers of nurses.13 A 2002 report by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations called the nursing shortage “a prescription for danger” and found that a shortage of nurses contributed to nearly a quarter of the anticipated problems that result in death or injury to hospital patients.14 · Low Nurse -to-Patient Ratios: With managed care restructuring the health care industry in the 1990s, hospitals reduced staffing levels to lower costs. Nurses care for more patients and patients who are more acutely ill due to shorter hospital stays. One study of hospital staffing found that decreases in the number of LPN/LVNs added to RNs’ patient load.15 Studies have linked low nurse-to-patient ratios to medical errors and to poorer patient outcomes, as well as to nurses leaving patient care. A 2002 study by Linda Aiken, et al., found that for each additional patient over four in an RN’s workload, the risk of death increases by 7% for hospital patients. Patients in hospitals with eight patients per nurse have a 31% higher risk of dying than those in hospitals with four patients per nurse.16 The IOM study recommends that nurse staffing levels be raised in all health care facilities.17 · Mandatory Overtime and Floating: Because of the nursing shortage, many hospitals routinely require nurses to work unplanned or mandatory overtime and to “float” to departments outside their expertise. On average, RNs work 8.5 weeks of overtime per year according to a recent union survey.18 Mandatory overtime was an issue in several recent strikes and 77% of RNs favor a law banning it except when an emergency is declared.19 · Burnout: Among nurses there are high rates of emotional exhaustion and job dissatisfaction which are strongly associated with inadequate staffing and low nurse-to-patient ratios. The Aiken study found each additional patient per nurse corresponds to a 23% increased risk of burnout, as well as a 15% increase in the risk of job dissatisfaction.20 A 2000 survey reported a satisfaction rate of just 69.5% among RNs, substantially lower than the 90% overall job satisfaction among professionals. This dissatisfaction is clearly linked to the departure of RNs from the nursing work force. In a survey conducted by the American Nurses Association, 33% of nurses under the age of 30 stated their intent to leave their present job within the year.21 · A study by Peter Hart & Associates found 50% of employed RNs had considered leaving patient care within the last two years for reasons other than retirement, and 21% of them said they expect to quit within five years. Nurses who are considering leaving patient care and those who have quit consistently cite better staffing levels and more time with patients as key to persuading them to stay or return to patient care.22 · Some nurses have left hospitals to work in less stressful environments. In 2000, an estimated 21% of all acute care hospital nurses left their positions.23 The proportion of RNs who work in hospitals fell from 66.5% in 1992 to 59% in 2000.24 · Healthcare employers are increasingly recruiting nurses from overseas, which allows them to avoid making fundamental changes to improve the quality of care, retain nurses, and make nursing an attractive career. The nursing crisis is an international problem: nurses’ organizations from 69 countries and every geographic area reported a shortage of nurses. Overseas recruitment drains health care personnel from countries with more limited resources and health care personnel, and jeopardizes the well-being of their citizens. In Ghana, more than 500 nurses left the country in 2000 for higher paying jobs in richer countries ¾ three times the total recorded in 1999 and more than twice the number of nursing graduates Ghana produced that year. Thirty-three countries ¾ primarily in Oceania, Africa, Central America and the Caribbean ¾ reported that the outflow of nurses to more affluent countries was a serious to extremely serious problem, which worsens the shortage that already exists.25
In addition,
extensive use of temporary visa programs
frequently depresses wages and guest workers
themselves are particularly open to
exploitation. Nursing Is a Dangerous Occupation Nurses are at high risk of injury or illness due to occupational hazards. · Registered nursing is one of 10 jobs with the highest levels of occupational injury or illness requiring days away from work, with 20,650 cases reported in private industry in 2003. Nurses accounted for 20% of all workplace injuries or illnesses requiring 3-5 days off work, as well as 20% of all cases requiring 31 days off or more.26 · In 2002, the non-fatal occupational injury and illness rate was 7.4 cases per 100 health care workers, compared to 4.6 per capita cases among workers in the service sector and 5.3 per capita cases in the private sector generally.27
·
In
a 2001 survey, the American Nurses Association
(ANA) found that 40% of their members had been
injured in the previous year, including needle
sticks, but many had not reported the injuries.28 Nurses Are Still Undervalued and Underpaid Nursing has historically been an undervalued and underpaid profession, considering the high level of education, skills and responsibility required of nurses. · RNs’ wages have generally stagnated during the past ten years, particularly after 1994 when managed care restructured the health care industry and many nurses were laid off. In spite of the difficulty in retaining experienced nurses, employers have yet to raise nurses’ salaries dramatically, as they did in the late 1980s in response to the last nurse shortage.29 Some employers have offered bonuses as incentives to attract new nurses to their hospitals, but this policy does not benefit experienced nurses or help to retain them. · RNs’ average weekly wages fell by 2.1% from 1994 to 1999, while wages for the total labor market increased by 4.7% during that period.30 · RNs’ wages regained some ground between 1999 and 2004, increasing 6.2% during that period, a faster earnings increase than that of the labor force as a whole (2.4%). This translates to real (inflation-adjusted) weekly earnings of $851 in 1999 to $904 in 2004.31 · These gains only minimally offset the previous losses, as RNs’ wages rose by only 4% from 1994 to 2004, while real wages for the total labor force rose 7.2%.32
·
LPN/LVNs’ average weekly
wages fell by 1.5% from 1994 to 1999. LPN/LVNs
gained a 12.7% wage increase from 1999–2004,
with a net result of 11% growth for the decade.
In dollar amounts, median real weekly earnings
for LPN/LVNs increased from $565 in 1999 to $637
in 2004.33 Benefits Are Poor but Increasing · Healthcare employers spend less on benefits than other non-manufacturing employers. Healthcare employers contributed only 6.7% of payroll costs to employees’ pensions in 2002, compared to 9.6% spent by all non-manufacturing employers. For medical and medically-related benefits, the health care industry provided 6.6% of payroll, while all non-manufacturing employers spent 9.9%.34 The healthcare percentage is a significant increase from 2000, however when only 1.5% of payroll for healthcare employers surveyed went to employee pensions. · Because the nursing profession is overwhelmingly female, health care employers have justified lower benefits contributions by arguing that women tend to move in and out of the workforce and rely on their husbands’ pensions and insurance. However, fewer women can count on a husband’s benefits, both because fewer women are married and because more employers are reducing or eliminating coverage for workers and their families.35
·
There are considerable variations
in wages and benefits based on geographic
region, full-time/part-time status, work
setting, hospital characteristics and
union/non-union status. [Union members have
significantly better benefits.]36 After Accelerating for a Decade, Union Organizing Declines · Health care workers represent a large portion of all workers holding representation elections. One in seven of the 2,735 NLRB representation elections held in 2004 was held among workers in the health care industry. Workers in this industry were more likely to vote for a union than in industries in general: 60% for health care compared to 53% for all industries in 2004.37 · The number of representation elections in the health care industry increased by 47.7% between 1990 and 2000, while overall, there was a 6% decline in representation elections. However, between 2000 and 2004, the number of representation elections held decreased by 31%.38 · Among RNs, union membership decreased slightly between 1994 and 2004, from 17.3% to 16.7%. Union density fell from 13.7% to 10.8% among LPN/LVNs.39 · The percentage of RNs represented by a union also decreased slightly, from 20.1% in 1994 to 18.7% in 2004. For LPN/LVNs, union representation dropped from 16.5% to 11.9% in 2004.40 · Nurses covered by a union contract in 2004 earned 14% more per week than non-covered nurses. Union RNs earned $980 per week on average, compared to $860 for nonunion RNs. LPN/LVNs belonging to unions earned $705 per week compared to $631 for nonunion LPN/LVNs—a wage premium of nearly 12%.41
2 Hecker, Daniel. “Occupational Employment Projections to 2012”. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Monthly Labor Review, February 2004, Vol. 127, No. 2. 3 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, Table 11, 2004, 2005. 4 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Monthly Labor Review, February 2004, Vol. 127, No. 2. 5 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, Table 11, 1995, 2005. 6 Ibid. 7 Ibid. 8 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bureau of Nursing, National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses, 1980–2000. 9 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Projected Supply, Demand, and Shortages of RNs: 2000–2020, July 2002. 10 Buerhaus, Peter. Journal of the American Medical Association, June 14, 2000. 11 American Association of Colleges of Nursing, Press Release, December 22, 2003. 12 American College of Nursing, AACN White Paper: Faculty Shortages in Baccalaureate and Graduate Nursing Programs: Scope of the Problem and Strategies for Expanding the Supply, May 2003. 13 Institute of Medicine, Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses, 2003. 14 Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Healthcare at the Crossroads: Strategies for Addressing the Nursing Crisis, August 2002. 15 Unruh, Lynn. “Licensed Nurse Staffing and Adverse Events in Hospitals,” Medical Care, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2003. 16 Linda H. Aiken, PhD, RN; Sean P. Clarke, PhD, RN; Douglas M. Sloane, PhD; Julie Sochalski, PhD, RN; Jeffery H. Silber, MD, PhD, “Hospital Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 288, No. 16, October 23-30, 2002. 17 Keeping Patients Safe, op. cit. 18 Service Employees International Union, The Shortage of Care: A Study by SEIU Nurse Alliance, 2001. 19 The Shortage of Care, op. cit. 20 “Hospital Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction” op. cit. 21 Keeping Patients Safe, op. cit. 22 Peter D. Hart Research Associates, The Nurse Shortage: Perspectives from Current Direct Care Nurses and Former Direct Care Nurses, April 2001. 23 Keeping Patients Safe, op. cit. 24 The Nurse Shortage: Perspectives from Current Direct Care Nurses and Former Direct Care Nurses, April 2001. 25 International Council of Nurses, Socio-Economic News, “Global Issues in the Supply and Demand of Nurses,” January-March 2003. 26 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Lost-Worktime Injuries and Illnesses: Characteristics and Resulting Time Away from Work 2003, 2005. 27 Ibid. 28 American Nurses Association, On-Line Health and Safety Survey, 2001. 29 American Federation of Teachers, Healthcare, State of the Healthcare Workforce, 2003, 2004. 30 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, Table 39, 1995, 2000. 31 Wage estimates from the 1995, 2000, and 2005 CPS data are adjusted to reflect inflation using the Consumer Price Index. 32 U.S. Department of Labor, Current Population Survey, Table 39, 1995, 2000, 2005. 33 Ibid. 34 U.S. Chamber of Commerce, The 2002 Employee Benefits Study, 2003. 35 The State of the Healthcare Workforce, op. cit. 36 Ibid. 37 The National Labor Relations Board, “The Annual Report of the National Labor Relations Board,” 1991, 2001, 2005. 38 Ibid. 39 Bureau of National Affairs, Union Membership and Earnings Data Book: Compilations of the Current Population Survey, 2005. 40 Ibid. 41 Ibid.
For further information on professional workers, check out DPE’s Web site: www.dpeaflcio.org.
Source: DPE
Research Department Contact: Pamela Wilson, (202) 638-6684
|
|
Newsline | About DPE | Affiliates | Public Policy | Programs & Publications Copyright © 2001 Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO. All rights reserved. |
