|
Fact Sheet 2006

Nurses: Vital Signs
A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE STATE OF THE
NURSING PROFESSION IN THE UNITED STATES
More
Nurses Are Needed
·
Registered nursing was among the
fastest growing occupations in the 1990s. By
2005, the number of employed RNs was 2,416,000 –
an increase of 52% since 1990.1
·
In 2005, the U.S. Department of
Labor identified “Registered Nurse” as the
occupation expected to experience the second
largest job growth in the 10 years from 2004 to
2014. The need for RNs is projected to grow
rapidly, rising by 29.4% between 2004 and 2014,
compared to 13% during the same period for all
occupations. More than 1.2 million openings for
RNs are projected by 2014 due to growth and
replacements.2
·
Despite small declines from 2002
to 2004, the number of Licensed Practical Nurses
and Licensed Vocational Nurses is expected to
increase 17.1% between 2004 and 2014. The
number of LPN/LVNs is projected to increase
during this period from 726,000 to 850,000.3,4
The Nurse Work
Force Is Aging and Changing
·
The vast majority of nurses are
women, although the percentage of men in the
field increased slightly in the last decade:
the percentage of male RNs rose from 6.9% in
1995 to 7.7% in 2005, and the percentage of male
LPN/LVNs increased slightly from 4.6% to 6.6%.5
·
Most nurses are white, although
the percentage of minorities among nurses is
increasing. From 1995–2005:
— The Black or
African American share of RN positions increased
from 8.4% to 10%. The proportion of black
LPN/LVNs also increased from 19.6% to 21.6%.
African Americans made up 10.8% of the total
labor force in 2005.6
— The percentage of Hispanic or Latino RNs increased from 2.6% to 4.3%
from 1995–2005. Latinos’ share of LPN/LVN
positions increased from 3.7% to 5.5%, while
they made up 13.1% of the labor force in
2005.7
·
The nurse population is aging, since fewer people are entering the
profession. The average age of RNs increased
from 36 in 1980 to 45 in 2000. Over two-thirds
of RNs are 40 or older. In 1992, 24% of RNs
were between the ages of 25 and 34; by 2000,
less than 16% of RNs were in that age group.8
A Severe
Shortage of Nurses Causes a Crisis
·
The
U.S. is experiencing a severe nursing crisis
that will intensify as baby boomers age and the
need for health care grows. The Health
Resources and Services Administration estimated
nurse shortages in 30 states in 2000 and
projects the problem to expand to 44 states and
the District of Columbia by 2020.9
Another study predicts a shortfall of 400,000
RNs by 202010,
while yet another projects a shortage of 800,000
by 2020.11
Factors
involved in the shortage include insufficient
new nursing school graduates, partly due to a
serious shortage of nursing school faculty; an
aging nurse population, and widespread burnout
among nurses because of understaffing.
·
Nursing School Enrollment:
Enrollments in entry-level RN baccalaureate
programs began declining in 1995 and continued
until 2000. Recently, however, there has been
resurgence in the number of students studying
nursing, with five consecutive years of
increasing enrollments. Most recently, 2005 saw
a 13% increase in enrollments; 2003 and 2004
also had increases in the double digits. The
number of graduates from entry-level
baccalaureate programs also increased, up 19.1%
in 2005.12
·
Shortage of Faculty for Nursing Schools:
The shortage of faculty makes it impossible to
train sufficient nurses, a problem which is
becoming especially acute as enrollments at
nursing schools increase. The American
Association of Colleges of Nursing has reported
a national nurse faculty vacancy rate of 8.1%.
In 2005, 32,797 qualified applicants to
baccalaureate, master’s and doctoral programs
were not accepted. This is a nine-fold increase
since 2002 in the number of qualified applicants
turned away, and a shortage of faculty has been
cited as the reason why more students were not
admitted. Of these qualified applicants denied
admission, some 3,000 could potentially have
filled faculty roles.12
·
Understaffing:
There are not enough nurses to do what needs to
be done on any given shift and the nurses who
are on duty are exhausted and stressed. A 2003
study by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) found
the environment in which nurses work a breeding
ground for medical errors which will continue to
threaten patient safety until substantially
reformed. The IOM points to numerous studies
showing that increased infections, bleeding and
cardiac and respiratory failure are associated
with inadequate numbers of nurses.3
A 2002 report by the Joint Commission on
Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations called
the nursing shortage “a prescription for danger”
and found that a shortage of nurses contributed
to nearly a quarter of the anticipated problems
that result in death or injury to hospital
patients.14
·
Low
Nurse -to-Patient
Ratios: With managed care restructuring the health care industry in the 1990s,
hospitals reduced staffing levels to lower
costs. Nurses care for more patients and
patients who are more acutely ill due to shorter
hospital stays. One study of hospital staffing
found that decreases in the number of LPN/LVNs
added to RNs’ patient load.15
Studies have linked low nurse-to-patient ratios
to medical errors and to poorer patient
outcomes, as well as to nurses leaving patient
care. A 2002 study by Linda Aiken, et al.,
found that for each additional patient over four
in an RN’s workload, the risk of death increases
by 7% for hospital patients. Patients in
hospitals with eight patients per nurse have a
31% higher risk of dying than those in hospitals
with four patients per nurse.16
The IOM study
recommends
that nurse staffing levels be raised in all
health care facilities.17
Implementing laws regulating
nurse-to-patient ratios can have a big effect on
understaffing. The California Nurses’
Association reports that after the enactment of
a staffing ratio law at the beginning of 2004,
the number of actively licensed nurses in
California increased by more than 48,000 (20%),
and the number of license applications increased
by 60% since 2002. Furthermore, California
nursing schools increased their capacities, and
the state reported a net influx of nurses from
other states.18
·
Mandatory Overtime and Floating:
Because of the nursing shortage, many hospitals
routinely require nurses to work unplanned or
mandatory overtime and to “float” to departments
outside their expertise. On average, RNs work
8.5 weeks of overtime per year according to a
recent union survey.19 Mandatory
overtime was an issue in several recent strikes
and 77% of RNs favor a law banning it except
when an emergency is declared.20
·
Burnout:
Among nurses there are high rates of emotional
exhaustion and job dissatisfaction which are
strongly associated with inadequate staffing and
low nurse-to-patient ratios. The Aiken study
found each additional patient per nurse
corresponds to a 23% increased risk of burnout,
as well as a 15% increase in the risk of job
dissatisfaction.1
A 2000 survey reported a
satisfaction rate of just 69.5% among RNs,
substantially lower than the 90% overall job
satisfaction among professionals. This
dissatisfaction is clearly linked to the
departure of RNs from the nursing work force.
In a survey conducted by the American Nurses
Association, 33% of nurses under the age of 30
stated their intent to leave their present job
within the year.2
·
A study by Peter Hart & Associates
found 50% of employed RNs had considered leaving
patient care within the last two years for
reasons other than retirement, and 21% of them
said they expect to quit within five years.
Nurses who are considering leaving patient care
and those who have quit consistently cite better
staffing levels and more time with patients as
key to persuading them to stay or return to
patient care.3
·
Some nurses have left hospitals to work in less
stressful environments. In 2000, an estimated
21% of all acute care hospital nurses left their
positions.4
The proportion of RNs who work in hospitals fell
from 66.5% in 1992 to 59% in 2000.5
·
Healthcare
employers are increasingly recruiting nurses
from overseas,
which allows them to avoid making fundamental
changes to improve the quality of care, retain
nurses, and make nursing an attractive career.
The nursing crisis is an
international problem: nurses’ organizations from 69 countries and
every geographic area reported a shortage of
nurses. Overseas recruitment drains health care
personnel from countries with more limited
resources and health care personnel, and
jeopardizes the well-being of their citizens.
In Ghana, more than 500 nurses left the country
in 2000 for higher paying jobs in richer
countries – three times the total recorded in
1999 and more than twice the number of nursing
graduates Ghana produced that year.
Thirty-three countries – primarily in Oceania,
Africa, Central America and the Caribbean –
reported that the outflow of nurses to more
affluent countries was a serious to extremely
serious problem, which worsens the shortage that
already exists.6
In addition, extensive use of
temporary visa programs frequently depresses
wages and guest workers themselves are
particularly open to exploitation.
Nursing
Is a Dangerous Occupation
Nurses are at
high risk of injury or illness due to
occupational hazards.
·
Registered nursing is one of 10
jobs with the highest levels of occupational
injury or illness requiring days away from work,
with 20,500 cases reported in private industry
in 2004. Among nurses, 21% of all workplace
injuries or illnesses required three to five
days off work, and almost 24% of cases required
31 days off or more. Sixteen percent of all
workplace injuries occurred in the health care
and social assistance industry, more than in the
construction, mining, and agriculture, forestry,
fishing & hunting industries combined.27
·
In 2004, the non-fatal
occupational injury and illness rate was 7.1
cases per 100 health care workers, compared to
3.9 cases per hundred among workers in the
social assistance sector and 4.8 cases per 100
workers in the private sector generally.28
·
In
a 2001 survey, the American Nurses Association
(ANA) found that 40% of their members had been
injured in the previous year, including needle
sticks, but many had not reported the injuries.29
Nurses Are
Still Undervalued and Underpaid
Nursing has
historically been an undervalued and underpaid
profession, considering the high level of
education, skills and responsibility required of
nurses.
·
RNs’ wages have generally stagnated during the
past ten years, particularly after 1994 when
managed care restructured the health care
industry and many nurses were laid off. In
spite of the difficulty in retaining
experienced
nurses, employers have yet to raise nurses’
salaries dramatically, as they did in the late
1980s in response to the last nurse shortage.30
Some employers have offered bonuses as
incentives to attract new nurses to their
hospitals, but this policy does not benefit
experienced nurses or help to retain them.
·
Adjusted for inflation,
RNs’ median weekly earnings increased by a mere
0.6% from 1995 to 2000, while wages for the
total labor market increased by 6.5% during that
period.31
·
RNs’ wages regained some
ground between 2000 and 2005, increasing 4.5%
during that period, during which time the
earnings of the labor force as a whole actually
fell by 0.3%. This translates to real
(inflation-adjusted) weekly earnings of $895 in
2000 to $935 in 2005.32
·
These gains only minimally offset
the previous losses, as RNs’ wages rose by only
5% from 1995 to 2005, while real wages for the
total labor force rose 6.2%.33
·
LPN/LVNs’ median weekly
earnings increased by 2.8% from 1995 to 2000.
In the past five years, these earnings increases
have accelerated, increasing 7% from 2000–2005,
with a net result of 10% growth for the decade.
In dollar amounts, median real weekly earnings
for LPN/LVNs increased from $584 in 2000 to $625
in 2005.34
·
Unions can have a very significant
impact on nurse wages. Nurses covered by a
union contract in 2005 earned 16% more per week
than non-covered nurses, while LPN/LVNs
represented by unions earned a wage premium of
nearly 15%. This translates to a weekly
earnings increase of about $148 for RNs and $89
for LPN/LVNs—an annual gain of $7,696 and
$4,628, respectively.35
·
In cities with a strong union
presence, wages are higher even for those nurses
who are not in unions.36
Benefits
Are Poor but Increasing
·
Healthcare employers spend less on
benefits than other non-manufacturing
employers. Healthcare employers contributed
only 6.7% of payroll costs to employees’
pensions in 2002, compared to 9.6% spent by all
non-manufacturing employers. For medical and
medically-related benefits, the health care
industry provided 6.6% of payroll, while all
non-manufacturing employers spent 9.9%.37
The healthcare percentage is a
significant increase from 2000, however, when
only 1.5% of payroll for healthcare employers
surveyed went to employee pensions.
·
Because the
nursing profession is overwhelmingly female,
health care employers have justified lower
benefits contributions by arguing that women
tend to move in and out of the workforce and
rely on their husbands’ pensions and insurance.
However, fewer women can count on a husband’s
benefits, both because fewer women are married
and because more employers are reducing or
eliminating coverage for workers and their families.38
·
There are considerable variations
in wages and benefits based on geographic
region, full-time/part-time status, work
setting, hospital characteristics and
union/non-union status. Union members have
significantly better benefits.39
After
Accelerating for a Decade, Union Organizing
Declines
·
Health care workers represent a large portion of
all workers holding representation elections.
More than one in eight of the 2,674 NLRB
representation elections held in 2005 was held
among workers in the health care industry.
Workers in this industry were more likely to
vote for a union than in industries in general:
almost 58% for health care, compared to 52% for
all industries in 2005.40
·
The
number of representation elections in the health
care industry increased by 47.7% between 1990
and 2000, while overall, there was a 6% decline
in representation elections. However, between
2000 and 2005, the number of representation
elections held decreased by almost 35%.41
·
Among RNs, union membership
dropped off between 1994 and 1995, falling from
17.3% to 15.2%. In the decade since, union
membership has rebounded slightly, to 16.6% in
2005. Union density fell from 12.8% in 1995 to
11.3% in 2005 among LPN/LVNs.42
·
The percentage of RNs represented
by a union also jumped downward between 1994 and
1995, from 20.1% to 17.6%. Again, in the
following decade there was only a slight
rebound, to 18.7% in 2005. For LPN/LVNs, union
representation dropped from 15.6% to 12.9% in
2005.43
________________________________________________________________________________
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Current Population Survey
[CPS], Table 11, 1991, 2006.
2 Hecker,
Daniel. “Occupational Employment Projections to
2014”. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Monthly Labor Review,
November 2005, Vol. 128, No. 11.
3 U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Current Population Survey, Table 11, 2005,
2006.
4Hecker,
Daniel, op. cit.
5 U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Current Population Survey, Table 11, 1996,
2006.
6
Ibid.
7
Ibid.
8 U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Bureau
of Nursing, National Sample Survey of
Registered Nurses, 1980–2000.
9 U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Health
Resources and Services Administration,
Projected Supply, Demand, and Shortages of RNs:
2000–2020, July 2002.
10 Buerhaus,
Peter. Journal of the American Medical
Association, June 14, 2000.
11 American
Association of Colleges of Nursing, Press
Release, “New Data Confirms Shortage of Nursing
School Faculty Hinders Efforts to Address the
Nation's Nursing Shortage”, March 8th,
2005.
12
Ibid.
13
Institute of Medicine, Keeping Patients
Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of
Nurses, 2003.
14
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations, Healthcare at the Crossroads:
Strategies for Addressing the Nursing Crisis,
August 2002.
15
Unruh, Lynn. “Licensed Nurse Staffing and
Adverse Events in Hospitals”, Medical Care,
Vol. 41, No. 1, 2003.
16
Linda H. Aiken, PhD, RN; Sean P. Clarke, PhD,
RN; Douglas M. Sloane, PhD; Julie Sochalski,
PhD, RN; Jeffery H. Silber, MD, PhD, “Hospital
Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse
Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction,” Journal of
the American Medical Association, Vol. 288,
No. 16, October 23–30, 2002.
17
Keeping Patients Safe, op. cit.
18
California Nurses’ Association, “RN Staffing
Ratios: The Real Story on the Nursing
Shortage”,
http://www.calnurses.org/nursing-practice/,
2005.
19
Service Employees International Union, The
Shortage of Care: A Study by SEIU Nurse
Alliance, 2001.
20
The Shortage
of Care, op. cit.
21
“Hospital
Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse
Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction”
op. cit.
22
Keeping
Patients Safe, op. cit.
23 Peter D. Hart
Research Associates, The Nurse Shortage:
Perspectives from Current Direct Care Nurses and
Former Direct Care Nurses, April 2001.
24
Keeping
Patients Safe, op. cit.
25
The Nurse
Shortage: Perspectives from Current Direct Care
Nurses and Former Direct Care Nurses, April
2001.
26 International
Council of Nurses, Socio-Economic News,
“Global Issues in the Supply and Demand of
Nurses”, January–March 2003.
27 U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Lost-Worktime Injuries and Illnesses:
Characteristics and Resulting Time Away from
Work 2004, 2005.
28
Ibid.
29 American
Nurses Association, On-Line Health and Safety
Survey, 2001.
30 American
Federation of Teachers, Healthcare, State of
the Healthcare Workforce, 2002, 2003.
31 U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Current Population Survey, Table 39,
1996, 2001.
32 Wage
estimates from the 1996, 2001, and 2006 CPS data
are adjusted to reflect inflation using the
Consumer Price Index.
33 U.S.
Department of Labor, Current Population
Survey, Table 39, 1996, 2001, 2006.
34
Ibid.
35 Bureau of
National Affairs, Union Membership and
Earnings Data Book: Compilations of the Current
Population Survey, 2006.
36
Lovell,
Vicky. “Solving the Nursing Shortage Through
Higher Wages”. Institute for Women’s Policy
Research, 2006.
37 U.S. Chamber
of Commerce, The 2002 Employee Benefits Study,
2003.
38
The State
of the Healthcare Workforce, op. cit.
39 Ibid;
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, “National Compensation Survey,
Employee Benefits in Private Industry in the
United States, March 2005”, August 2005.
40 The National
Labor Relations Board, “The Annual Report of the
National Labor Relations Board”, 1991, 2001,
2005.
41 Ibid.
42 Bureau of
National Affairs, Union Membership and
Earnings Data Book: Compilations of the Current
Population Survey, 2006.
43
Ibid.
For further
information on professional workers, check out
DPE’s Web site:
www.dpeaflcio.org.
The
Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO
(DPE) comprises 23 AFL-CIO unions representing
over four million people working in
professional, technical and administrative
support occupations. DPE-affiliated unions
represent: teachers, college professors and
school administrators; library workers; nurses,
doctors and other health care professionals;
engineers, scientists and IT workers;
journalists and writers, broadcast technicians
and communications specialists; performing and
visual artists; professional athletes;
professional firefighters; psychologists, social
workers and many others. DPE was chartered by
the AFL-CIO in 1977 in recognition of the
rapidly-growing professional and technical
occupations.
Source: Department for Professional
Employees
Research Department
815 16th Street, NW, N.W.
7th Floor
Washington, DC 20006
Contact: Pamela Wilson
|